Hi Dan,

Thanks for the patch set.

Both patches applied to the for-4.16 branch of linux-leds.git.

Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski

On 11/15/2017 08:52 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Add the regulator enable call during initialization.
> If init fails then disable the regulator.
> 
> Also during init the gpio gets set low even
> on a passing case so add if everything passes
> then return.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/leds/leds-lp8860.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-lp8860.c b/drivers/leds/leds-lp8860.c
> index 91b6c5fbd361..f91a4fe25168 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-lp8860.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-lp8860.c
> @@ -247,6 +247,15 @@ static int lp8860_init(struct lp8860_led *led)
>       unsigned int read_buf;
>       int ret, i, reg_count;
>  
> +     if (led->regulator) {
> +             ret = regulator_enable(led->regulator);
> +             if (ret) {
> +                     dev_err(&led->client->dev,
> +                             "Failed to enable regulator\n");
> +                     return ret;
> +             }
> +     }
> +
>       if (led->enable_gpio)
>               gpiod_direction_output(led->enable_gpio, 1);
>  
> @@ -282,12 +291,25 @@ static int lp8860_init(struct lp8860_led *led)
>       ret = regmap_write(led->regmap,
>                       LP8860_EEPROM_CNTRL,
>                       LP8860_PROGRAM_EEPROM);
> -     if (ret)
> +     if (ret) {
>               dev_err(&led->client->dev, "Failed programming EEPROM\n");
> +             goto out;
> +     }
> +
> +     return ret;
> +
>  out:
>       if (ret)
>               if (led->enable_gpio)
>                       gpiod_direction_output(led->enable_gpio, 0);
> +
> +     if (led->regulator) {
> +             ret = regulator_disable(led->regulator);
> +             if (ret)
> +                     dev_err(&led->client->dev,
> +                             "Failed to disable regulator\n");
> +     }
> +
>       return ret;
>  }
>  
> 

Reply via email to