Hi Yixun, Jian,
On 17/11/2017 09:02, Yixun Lan wrote:
> From: Jian Hu <jian...@amlogic.com>
>
> There are four I2C masters in EE domain, and one I2C Master in
> AO domain, the DT info here should describe them all.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jian Hu <jian...@amlogic.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yixun Lan <yixun....@amlogic.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-axg.dtsi | 59
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-axg.dtsi
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-axg.dtsi
> index 57faaa9d8013..99e967aff439 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-axg.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-axg.dtsi
> @@ -129,6 +129,54 @@
> #reset-cells = <1>;
> };
>
> + i2c_m0: i2c@1f000 {
Can you use a more simple "i2c0" phandle naming instead ? or get back to the
"i2c_A/B/C/D" naming like in meson_gx to keep consistency ?
[...]
> + };
> +
> + i2c_m1: i2c@1e000 {
[...]
> + };
> +
> + i2c_m2: i2c@1d000 {
[...]
> + };
> +
> + i2c_m3: i2c@1c000 {
[...]
> + };
> +
> uart_A: serial@24000 {
> compatible = "amlogic,meson-gx-uart",
> "amlogic,meson-uart";
> reg = <0x0 0x24000 0x0 0x14>;
> @@ -312,6 +360,17 @@
> };
> };
>
> + i2c_ao: i2c@5000 {
Can you keep the same "i2c_AO" as in meson-gx ?
[...]
> + };
> +
> uart_AO: serial@3000 {
> compatible = "amlogic,meson-gx-uart",
> "amlogic,meson-ao-uart";
> reg = <0x0 0x3000 0x0 0x18>;
>
Neil
