The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
for zero is not correct.

Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav...@gmail.com>
---
changes in v2 :
               irq was unsigned. so changed it to signed.
changes in v3 :
              Add failure case '<= 0' instead of '< 0'. IRQ0 is not valid.
changes in v4 :
              Return -ENODEV insted of irq.

 sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c b/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
index bbf7a92..efeecee 100644
--- a/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
+++ b/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
@@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ static int ep93xx_ac97_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
        struct ep93xx_ac97_info *info;
        struct resource *res;
-       unsigned int irq;
+       int irq;
        int ret;
 
        info = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ static int ep93xx_ac97_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
                return PTR_ERR(info->regs);
 
        irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
-       if (!irq)
+       if (irq <= 0)
                return -ENODEV;
 
        ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, ep93xx_ac97_interrupt,
-- 
2.7.4

Reply via email to