On Tue, 8 May 2007, Russell King wrote:
>
> Shall I invent __CPUINIT to mark data to always be thrown away, or are
> the x86 folk going to withdraw this patch and do it properly?
I can certainly revert the patch, but it would probably be better if you
were to just start adding the infrastructure you need and send it as a new
patch instead (where the revert is part of it, and the __CPUINIT is
additional).
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
