On 11/21/2017 03:14 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Bisect points to
> 
> 1b5a7455d345b223d3a4658a9e5fce985b7998c1 is the first bad commit
> commit 1b5a7455d345b223d3a4658a9e5fce985b7998c1
> Author: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
> Date:   Mon Jun 26 12:20:57 2017 +0200
> 
>     blk-mq: Create hctx for each present CPU
>     
>     commit 4b855ad37194f7bdbb200ce7a1c7051fecb56a08 upstream.
>     
>     Currently we only create hctx for online CPUs, which can lead to a lot
>     of churn due to frequent soft offline / online operations.  Instead
>     allocate one for each present CPU to avoid this and dramatically simplify
>     the code.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
>     Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
>     Cc: Keith Busch <[email protected]>
>     Cc: [email protected]
>     Cc: [email protected]
>     Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
>     Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
>     Cc: Oleksandr Natalenko <[email protected]>
>     Cc: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
>     Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

I wonder if we're simply not getting the masks updated correctly. I'll
take a look.

-- 
Jens Axboe

Reply via email to