On 11/21/2017 11:18 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:43:43PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote: SNIPdiff --git a/tools/perf/util/target.h b/tools/perf/util/target.h index 446aa7a..6ef01a8 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/target.h +++ b/tools/perf/util/target.h @@ -64,6 +64,11 @@ static inline bool target__none(struct target *target) return !target__has_task(target) && !target__has_cpu(target); }+static inline bool target__has_per_thread(struct target *target)+{ + return target->system_wide && target->per_thread; +}this is confusing.. has_per_thread depends on system_wide?
This patch series only supports to get per-thread data for the whole system. So I add checking of system_wide here.
+ static inline bool target__uses_dummy_map(struct target *target) { bool use_dummy = false; @@ -73,6 +78,8 @@ static inline bool target__uses_dummy_map(struct target *target) else if (target__has_task(target) || (!target__has_cpu(target) && !target->uses_mmap)) use_dummy = true; + else if (target__has_per_thread(target)) + use_dummy = true;why do we need dummy_map for this? please comment
We need dummy_map here. That's similar to the processing of '--per-thread -p -t'.
We need a dummy map to help us to aggregate counts per-thread. Thanks Jin Yao
thanks, jirka

