On 22-11-17, 06:55, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 21-11-17, 18:00, Javi Merino wrote: > > As Ionela pointed out earlier in the thread, the cpufreq driver for Juno > > was not acceptable for mainline because it used platform specific code. > > Can we get a link to that thread? I don't remember what I have commented > earlier > but the above doesn't seem to be entirely true. > > The basic idea is to use as much common stuff as possible and so to use > cpufreq-dt.c if possible. Its not that we are against platform specific bits, > they are fine if they are really required.
Just to correct everyone here, Juno doesn't use the cpufreq-dt driver but scpi-cpufreq.c :) -- viresh
