On Tue, 8 May 2007 11:03:20 -0700 "Luck, Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +#ifndef is_affinity_mask_valid > +#define is_affinity_mask_valid() 1 > +#endif > + > int no_irq_affinity; > static int irq_affinity_write_proc(struct file *file, const char __user > *buffer, > unsigned long count, void *data) > @@ -42,6 +46,9 @@ static int irq_affinity_write_proc(struc > if (err) > return err; > > + if (!is_affinity_mask_valid(new_value)) > + return -EINVAL; > > This results in a warning: > kernel/irq/proc.c:49: warning: implicit declaration of function > `is_affinity_mask_valid' > It had a dopey little bug: diff -puN kernel/irq/proc.c~sn-validate-smp_affinity-mask-on-intr-redirect-fix kernel/irq/proc.c --- a/kernel/irq/proc.c~sn-validate-smp_affinity-mask-on-intr-redirect-fix +++ a/kernel/irq/proc.c @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ static int irq_affinity_read_proc(char * } #ifndef is_affinity_mask_valid -#define is_affinity_mask_valid() 1 +#define is_affinity_mask_valid(val) 1 #endif int no_irq_affinity; _ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
