On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 21:10 +0100, James Simmons wrote: > > This patch has the VT subsystem use tty_schedule_flip instead of > con_schedule_flip. There are two ways we can approach this. We can > do the below path or extend tty_schedule_flip to accept a time field. > Comments welcomed.
This looks reasonable. I don't think a time field is necessary. In fact, I think the scheduled_delayed_work() in tty_schedule_flip() should use a time of 0 just like con_schedule_flip(). As the tty flip buffer code has evolved, that delay value of 1 was carried along. It may have had some historical purpose, but I can't figure it out and it appears to have no use currently. It would be better for performance to process the receive data as soon as possible (delay value of 0). -- Paul Fulghum Microgate Systems, Ltd - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/