Hi Martin, On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 09:45:18AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > This adds an SPDX license identifier to this driver I wrote some time back. > > Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger <mart...@posteo.de> > --- > drivers/input/tablet/pegasus_notetaker.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/input/tablet/pegasus_notetaker.c > b/drivers/input/tablet/pegasus_notetaker.c > index 47de5a81172f..cdf75c989469 100644 > --- a/drivers/input/tablet/pegasus_notetaker.c > +++ b/drivers/input/tablet/pegasus_notetaker.c > @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
Should this be GPL-2.0+? The MODULE_LICENSE specifies that the module is "GPL" which in kernel land means GPLv2+. Or we should change the module license to strict "GPLv2"? Also, why do we use C++ -style comments for this? Greg, do you have any plans on dropping MODULE_LICENSE() altogether and generating the appropriate string from SPDX markings in the source? Doing this would prevent mismatches between license notices, SPDX tags and MODULE_LCENSE() strings, which happen very often. > /* > * Pegasus Mobile Notetaker Pen input tablet driver > * Thanks. -- Dmitry