On Sun, 26 Nov 2017, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-11-26 at 19:17 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > > I just assume that a printk that has no KERN_ is adding a > > newline, which is my understanding of Joe's comment. > > More precisely: > > Any printk without an initial KERN_CONT prepends a newline > if the last printk content char emitted that is not part > of a printk timestamp/header was not a newline. Ah, I misunderstood. I thought it was any printk that has no KERN indicator at all. That I can fix. julia
