Of course! Thank you, you save my poor english :).

在 2017/11/27 19:58, Michal Hocko 写道:
On Mon 27-11-17 19:53:18, guoxuenan wrote:
From: chenjie <chenj...@huawei.com>

The madvise() system call supported a set of "conventional" advice values,
the MADV_WILLNEED parameter has possibility of triggering an infinite loop under
direct access mode(DAX).

Infinite loop situation:
1、initial state [ start = vam->vm_start < vam->vm_end < end ].
2、madvise_vma() using MADV_WILLNEED parameter;
    madvise_vma() -> madvise_willneed() -> return 0 && the value of [prev] is 
not updated.

In function SYSCALL_DEFINE3(madvise,...)
When [start = vam->vm_start] the program enters "for" loop,
find_vma_prev() will set the pointer vma and the pointer prev(prev = 
vam->vm_prev).
Normally ,madvise_vma() will always move the pointer prev ,but when use DAX 
mode,
it will never update the value of [prev].

=======================================================================
SYSCALL_DEFINE3(madvise,...)
{
        [...]
        //start = vam->start  => prev=vma->prev
     vma = find_vma_prev(current->mm, start, &prev);
        [...]
        for(;;)
        {
              update [start = vma->vm_start]

        con0: if (start >= end)                 //false always;
            goto out;
               tmp = vma->vm_end;

        //do not update [prev] and always return 0;
               error = madvise_willneed();

        con1: if (error)                        //false always;
            goto out;

        //[ vam->vm_start < start = vam->vm_end  <end ]
               update [start = tmp ]

        con2: if (start >= end)                 //false always ;
            goto out;

        //because of pointer [prev] did not change,[vma] keep as it was;
               update [ vma = prev->vm_next ]
        }
        [...]
}
=======================================================================
After the first cycle ;it will always keep
vam->vm_start < start = vam->vm_end  < end  && vma = prev->vm_next;
since Circulation exit conditions (con{0,1,2}) will never meet ,the
program stuck in infinite loop.

I find your changelog a bit hard to parse. What would you think about
the following:
"
MADVISE_WILLNEED has always been a noop for DAX (formerly XIP) mappings.
Unfortunatelly madvise_willneed doesn't communicate this information
properly to the generic madvise syscall implementation. The calling
converion is quite subtle there. madvise_vma is supposed to either
return an error or update &prev otherwise the main loop will never
advance to the next vma and it will keep looping for ever without a way
to get out of the kernel.

It seems this has been broken since introduced. Nobody has noticed
because nobody seems to be using MADVISE_WILLNEED on these DAX mappings.

Fixes: fe77ba6f4f97 ("[PATCH] xip: madvice/fadvice: execute in place")
Cc: stable
"

Signed-off-by: chenjie <chenj...@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: guoxuenan <guoxue...@huawei.com>

Other than that
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com>

---
  mm/madvise.c | 4 +---
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
index 375cf32..751e97a 100644
--- a/mm/madvise.c
+++ b/mm/madvise.c
@@ -276,15 +276,14 @@ static long madvise_willneed(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
  {
        struct file *file = vma->vm_file;
+ *prev = vma;
  #ifdef CONFIG_SWAP
        if (!file) {
-               *prev = vma;
                force_swapin_readahead(vma, start, end);
                return 0;
        }
if (shmem_mapping(file->f_mapping)) {
-               *prev = vma;
                force_shm_swapin_readahead(vma, start, end,
                                        file->f_mapping);
                return 0;
@@ -299,7 +298,6 @@ static long madvise_willneed(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
                return 0;
        }
- *prev = vma;
        start = ((start - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT) + vma->vm_pgoff;
        if (end > vma->vm_end)
                end = vma->vm_end;
--
2.9.5



Reply via email to