On 11/27/2017 02:50 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 08:16:45AM +0100, Richard Leitner wrote: >> From: Richard Leitner <richard.leit...@skidata.com> >> >> Previously phy_id was u32 and phy_id_mask was unsigned int. As the >> phy_id_mask defines the important bits of the phy_id (and is therefore >> the same size) these two variables should be the same data type. > > Hi Richard > > It is normal to put inside the [] of the subject line which of the two > trees this patch is for. In this case net-next. > > No need to resend, but please try to do this for your the next > networking patch.
Ok. Thank you for the information. Just saw that it's described in netdev-FAQ.txt. Sorry for not reading that in advance! > > Andrew >
