Hi,
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 01:17:25PM +0100, Stefan Brüns wrote:
> Include the OF-based modalias in the uevent sent when registering devices
> on the sunxi RSB bus, so that user space has a chance to autoload the
> kernel module for the device.
>
> Fixes a regression caused by commit 3f241bfa60bd ("arm64: allwinner: a64:
> pine64: Use dcdc1 regulator for mmc0"). When the axp20x-rsb module for
> the AXP803 PMIC is built as a module, it is not loaded and the system
> ends up with an disfunctional MMC controller.
>
> Cc: stable <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Brüns <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c b/drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c
> index 328ca93781cf..37cb57244cbe 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/sunxi-rsb.c
> @@ -173,11 +173,24 @@ static int sunxi_rsb_device_remove(struct device *dev)
> return drv->remove(to_sunxi_rsb_device(dev));
> }
>
> +static int sunxi_rsb_device_uevent(struct device *dev,
> + struct kobj_uevent_env *env)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = of_device_uevent_modalias(dev, env);
> + if (ret != -ENODEV)
> + return ret;
A comment explaining why we need to ignore the ENODEV error code would
be great here.
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static struct bus_type sunxi_rsb_bus = {
> .name = RSB_CTRL_NAME,
> .match = sunxi_rsb_device_match,
> .probe = sunxi_rsb_device_probe,
> .remove = sunxi_rsb_device_remove,
> + .uevent = sunxi_rsb_device_uevent,
Any reason to not use of_device_uevent_modalias directly here?
Thanks!
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
