Hi, All,

My Surface Pro 4 is unable to boot after 4.12. The symptom is that
kernel freezes during boot, and the last message in the screen is
loading the initrd image. And I have bisected it to this commit

commit bd9240a18edfbfa72e957fc2ba831cf1f13ea073 (refs/bisect/bad)
Author:     Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
AuthorDate: Wed May 31 17:52:03 2017 +0200
Commit:     Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
CommitDate: Sun Jun 4 21:55:53 2017 +0200

    x86/apic: Add TSC_DEADLINE quirk due to errata
    
    Due to errata it is possible for the TSC_DEADLINE timer to
misbehave
    after using TSC_ADJUST. A microcode update is available to fix this
    situation.
    
    Avoid using the TSC_DEADLINE timer if it is affected by this issue
and
    report the required microcode version.
    
    [ tglx: Renamed function to apic_check_deadline_errata() ]
    
    Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org>
    Cc: kevin.b.stan...@intel.com
    Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170531155306.050849877@infradead.o
rg
    Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>

Currently, I'm using v4.14 kernel with the following workaround on top.

---
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
index ff89177..cd419d4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id deadline_match[] = {
        DEADLINE_MODEL_MATCH_REV ( INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_CORE,   0x25),
        DEADLINE_MODEL_MATCH_REV ( INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_GT3E,   0x17),
 
-       DEADLINE_MODEL_MATCH_REV ( INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_MOBILE,   0xb2),
+//     DEADLINE_MODEL_MATCH_REV ( INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_MOBILE,   0xb2),
        DEADLINE_MODEL_MATCH_REV ( INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_DESKTOP,  0xb2),
 
        DEADLINE_MODEL_MATCH_REV ( INTEL_FAM6_KABYLAKE_MOBILE,  0x52),
-- 
2.7.4

I'm reading the related code but have not figured out the root cause yet.
Anyone suggestions?

thanks,
rui

Reply via email to