4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
commit 07458f6a5171d97511dfbdf6ce549ed2ca0280c7 upstream.
'cached_raw_freq' is used to get the next frequency quickly but should
always be in sync with sg_policy->next_freq. There is a case where it is
not and in such cases it should be reset to avoid switching to incorrect
frequencies.
Consider this case for example:
- policy->cur is 1.2 GHz (Max)
- New request comes for 780 MHz and we store that in cached_raw_freq.
- Based on 780 MHz, we calculate the effective frequency as 800 MHz.
- We then see the CPU wasn't idle recently and choose to keep the next
freq as 1.2 GHz.
- Now we have cached_raw_freq is 780 MHz and sg_policy->next_freq is
1.2 GHz.
- Now if the utilization doesn't change in then next request, then the
next target frequency will still be 780 MHz and it will match with
cached_raw_freq. But we will choose 1.2 GHz instead of 800 MHz here.
Fixes: b7eaf1aab9f8 (cpufreq: schedutil: Avoid reducing frequency of busy CPUs
prematurely)
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -282,8 +282,12 @@ static void sugov_update_single(struct u
* Do not reduce the frequency if the CPU has not been idle
* recently, as the reduction is likely to be premature then.
*/
- if (busy && next_f < sg_policy->next_freq)
+ if (busy && next_f < sg_policy->next_freq) {
next_f = sg_policy->next_freq;
+
+ /* Reset cached freq as next_freq has changed */
+ sg_policy->cached_raw_freq = 0;
+ }
}
sugov_update_commit(sg_policy, time, next_f);
}
