4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Miklos Szeredi <mszer...@redhat.com>

commit f37650f1c7c71cf5180b43229d13b421d81e7170 upstream.

If fsnotify_prepare_user_wait() fails, we leave the event on the
notification list.  Which will result in a warning in
fsnotify_destroy_event() and later use-after-free.

Instead of adding a new helper to remove the event from the list in this
case, I opted to move the prepare/finish up into fanotify_handle_event().

This will allow these to be moved further out into the generic code later,
and perhaps let us move to non-sleeping RCU.

Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein <amir7...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszer...@redhat.com>
Fixes: 05f0e38724e8 ("fanotify: Release SRCU lock when waiting for userspace 
response")
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c |   33 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
+++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
@@ -65,19 +65,8 @@ static int fanotify_get_response(struct
 
        pr_debug("%s: group=%p event=%p\n", __func__, group, event);
 
-       /*
-        * fsnotify_prepare_user_wait() fails if we race with mark deletion.
-        * Just let the operation pass in that case.
-        */
-       if (!fsnotify_prepare_user_wait(iter_info)) {
-               event->response = FAN_ALLOW;
-               goto out;
-       }
-
        wait_event(group->fanotify_data.access_waitq, event->response);
 
-       fsnotify_finish_user_wait(iter_info);
-out:
        /* userspace responded, convert to something usable */
        switch (event->response) {
        case FAN_ALLOW:
@@ -212,9 +201,21 @@ static int fanotify_handle_event(struct
        pr_debug("%s: group=%p inode=%p mask=%x\n", __func__, group, inode,
                 mask);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_FANOTIFY_ACCESS_PERMISSIONS
+       if (mask & FAN_ALL_PERM_EVENTS) {
+               /*
+                * fsnotify_prepare_user_wait() fails if we race with mark
+                * deletion.  Just let the operation pass in that case.
+                */
+               if (!fsnotify_prepare_user_wait(iter_info))
+                       return 0;
+       }
+#endif
+
        event = fanotify_alloc_event(inode, mask, data);
+       ret = -ENOMEM;
        if (unlikely(!event))
-               return -ENOMEM;
+               goto finish;
 
        fsn_event = &event->fse;
        ret = fsnotify_add_event(group, fsn_event, fanotify_merge);
@@ -224,7 +225,8 @@ static int fanotify_handle_event(struct
                /* Our event wasn't used in the end. Free it. */
                fsnotify_destroy_event(group, fsn_event);
 
-               return 0;
+               ret = 0;
+               goto finish;
        }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_FANOTIFY_ACCESS_PERMISSIONS
@@ -233,6 +235,11 @@ static int fanotify_handle_event(struct
                                            iter_info);
                fsnotify_destroy_event(group, fsn_event);
        }
+finish:
+       if (mask & FAN_ALL_PERM_EVENTS)
+               fsnotify_finish_user_wait(iter_info);
+#else
+finish:
 #endif
        return ret;
 }


Reply via email to