On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 16:23:12 -0800
Andi Kleen <a...@firstfloor.org> wrote:

> From: Andi Kleen <a...@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Add a configurable node size to strlist, which allows users
> to store additional data in a str_node. Also add a new interface
> to add a new strlist node, and return the node, so additional
> data can be added.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <a...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/rblist.c  | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>  tools/perf/util/rblist.h  |  2 ++
>  tools/perf/util/strlist.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>  tools/perf/util/strlist.h |  8 ++++++++
>  4 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/rblist.c b/tools/perf/util/rblist.c
> index 0dfe27d99458..fa221e6b0932 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/rblist.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/rblist.c
> @@ -11,11 +11,13 @@
>  
>  #include "rblist.h"
>  
> -int rblist__add_node(struct rblist *rblist, const void *new_entry)
> +int rblist__add_node_ptr(struct rblist *rblist, const void *new_entry,
> +                    struct rb_node **nodep)
>  {
>       struct rb_node **p = &rblist->entries.rb_node;
>       struct rb_node *parent = NULL, *new_node;
>  
> +     *nodep = NULL;
>       while (*p != NULL) {
>               int rc;
>  
> @@ -26,13 +28,16 @@ int rblist__add_node(struct rblist *rblist, const void 
> *new_entry)
>                       p = &(*p)->rb_left;
>               else if (rc < 0)
>                       p = &(*p)->rb_right;
> -             else
> +             else {
> +                     *nodep = parent;
>                       return -EEXIST;
> +             }
>       }
>  
>       new_node = rblist->node_new(rblist, new_entry);
>       if (new_node == NULL)
>               return -ENOMEM;
> +     *nodep = new_node;
>  
>       rb_link_node(new_node, parent, p);
>       rb_insert_color(new_node, &rblist->entries);
> @@ -41,6 +46,13 @@ int rblist__add_node(struct rblist *rblist, const void 
> *new_entry)
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> +int rblist__add_node(struct rblist *rblist, const void *new_entry)
> +{
> +     struct rb_node *nd;
> +
> +     return rblist__add_node_ptr(rblist, new_entry, &nd);
> +}
> +
>  void rblist__remove_node(struct rblist *rblist, struct rb_node *rb_node)
>  {
>       rb_erase(rb_node, &rblist->entries);
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/rblist.h b/tools/perf/util/rblist.h
> index 4c8638a22571..2941e4295f63 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/rblist.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/rblist.h
> @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ struct rblist {
>  void rblist__init(struct rblist *rblist);
>  void rblist__delete(struct rblist *rblist);
>  int rblist__add_node(struct rblist *rblist, const void *new_entry);
> +int rblist__add_node_ptr(struct rblist *rblist, const void *new_entry,
> +                      struct rb_node **nodep);
>  void rblist__remove_node(struct rblist *rblist, struct rb_node *rb_node);
>  struct rb_node *rblist__find(struct rblist *rblist, const void *entry);
>  struct rb_node *rblist__findnew(struct rblist *rblist, const void *entry);
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/strlist.c b/tools/perf/util/strlist.c
> index 9de5434bb49e..68ef21c3797c 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/strlist.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/strlist.c
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ struct rb_node *strlist__node_new(struct rblist *rblist, 
> const void *entry)
>       const char *s = entry;
>       struct rb_node *rc = NULL;
>       struct strlist *strlist = container_of(rblist, struct strlist, rblist);
> -     struct str_node *snode = malloc(sizeof(*snode));
> +     struct str_node *snode = malloc(strlist->node_size);
>  
>       if (snode != NULL) {
>               if (strlist->dupstr) {
> @@ -66,6 +66,14 @@ int strlist__add(struct strlist *slist, const char 
> *new_entry)
>       return rblist__add_node(&slist->rblist, new_entry);
>  }
>  
> +struct str_node *strlist__add_node(struct strlist *slist, const char 
> *new_entry)
> +{
> +     struct rb_node *nd;
> +
> +     rblist__add_node_ptr(&slist->rblist, new_entry, &nd);
> +     return container_of(nd, struct str_node, rb_node);
> +}

It should check the result of rblist__add_node_ptr() and return NULL if an 
error.

> +
>  int strlist__load(struct strlist *slist, const char *filename)
>  {
>       char entry[1024];
> @@ -165,11 +173,15 @@ struct strlist *strlist__new(const char *list, const 
> struct strlist_config *conf
>               bool dupstr = true;
>               bool file_only = false;
>               const char *dirname = NULL;
> +             size_t node_size = sizeof(struct str_node);
>  
>               if (config) {
>                       dupstr = !config->dont_dupstr;
>                       dirname = config->dirname;
>                       file_only = config->file_only;
> +                     node_size = config->node_size;
> +                     if (!node_size)
> +                             node_size = sizeof(struct str_node);

This is dangerous, node_size can be smaller than sizeof(struct str_node).
Instead, why don't we use "data_size" and set additional data size?

Also, we can add "u8 data[0]" at the end of struct str_node, so that
user can easily access the appended data.

>               }
>  
>               rblist__init(&slist->rblist);
> @@ -179,6 +191,7 @@ struct strlist *strlist__new(const char *list, const 
> struct strlist_config *conf
>  
>               slist->dupstr    = dupstr;
>               slist->file_only = file_only;
> +             slist->node_size = node_size;
>  
>               if (list && strlist__parse_list(slist, list, dirname) != 0)
>                       goto out_error;
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/strlist.h b/tools/perf/util/strlist.h
> index d58f1e08b170..fd407e11e124 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/strlist.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/strlist.h
> @@ -16,25 +16,33 @@ struct strlist {
>       struct rblist rblist;
>       bool          dupstr;
>       bool          file_only;
> +     size_t        node_size;
>  };
>  
>  /*
>   * @file_only: When dirname is present, only consider entries as filenames,
>   *             that should not be added to the list if dirname/entry is not
>   *             found
> + * @node_size: Allocate extra space after str_node which can be used for 
> other
> + *          data. This is the complete size including str_node
>   */
>  struct strlist_config {
>       bool dont_dupstr;
>       bool file_only;
>       const char *dirname;
> +     size_t node_size;
>  };
>  
> +#define STRLIST_CONFIG_DEFAULT \
> +     { false, false, NULL, sizeof(struct str_node) }
> +
>  struct strlist *strlist__new(const char *slist, const struct strlist_config 
> *config);
>  void strlist__delete(struct strlist *slist);
>  
>  void strlist__remove(struct strlist *slist, struct str_node *sn);
>  int strlist__load(struct strlist *slist, const char *filename);
>  int strlist__add(struct strlist *slist, const char *str);
> +struct str_node *strlist__add_node(struct strlist *slist, const char *str);

Hmm, I see this is much more efficient, but from the programming point of view,
we can also use the combination of strlist__add() and strlist__find() for
that purpose.

BTW, what happen if we already have same string on strlist?

Thank you,


>  
>  struct str_node *strlist__entry(const struct strlist *slist, unsigned int 
> idx);
>  struct str_node *strlist__find(struct strlist *slist, const char *entry);
> -- 
> 2.13.6
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhira...@kernel.org>

Reply via email to