Re: [PATCH] x86/syscalls: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Mon, 27 Nov 2017, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:

> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.

>               case 0:
>                       if (!n--) break;
>                       *args++ = regs->bx;
> +                     /* fall through */

And these gazillions of pointless comments help enabling of
-Wimplicit-fallthrough in which way?

Thanks,

        tglx