On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Andries Brouwer wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 03:04:31PM +0100, Rogier Wolff wrote: > > > Ok, so if you read the standard carefully you get a bogus result. > > Why bogus? Things could have been otherwise, but the important > part is that all Unices do things the same way. Yes, and I think you'll have difficulty, Andries, finding any other Unices which interpret the standard as you and Linux do: Solaris, HP-UX, UnixWare and OpenServer all allow writing to a device node (or FIFO) on read-only filesystem. Hugh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- access() says EROFS even for device files if /dev is mo... Peter Cordes
- Re: access() says EROFS even for device files if /... Andries Brouwer
- Re: access() says EROFS even for device files ... Rogier Wolff
- Re: access() says EROFS even for device fi... Andries Brouwer
- Re: access() says EROFS even for devic... Rogier Wolff
- Re: access() says EROFS even for ... Andries Brouwer
- Re: access() says EROFS even ... Hugh Dickins
- Re: access() says EROFS e... Alexander Viro
- Re: access() says EROFS e... Hugh Dickins
- Re: access() says EROFS e... Alexander Viro
- Re: access() says EROFS e... Tigran Aivazian
- Re: access() says EROFS e... Alexander Viro
- Re: access() says EROFS e... Olivier Galibert
- Re: access() says EROFS e... Richard B. Johnson
- Re: access() says EROFS e... Tigran Aivazian
- Re: access() says EROFS e... Tigran Aivazian
- Re: access() says EROFS e... Alexander Viro