From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 08:29:16 -0800
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 05:08:40PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 13:33:06 -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> > + ret = idr_alloc_u32(&head->handle_idr, prog, &handle,
>> > + INT_MAX, GFP_KERNEL);
>> > + } else if (!oldprog) {
>> > + ret = idr_alloc_u32(&head->handle_idr, prog, &handle,
>> > + handle, GFP_KERNEL);
>>
>> nit: in many places you seem to not align the second line with opening
>> parenthesis. Is that intentional?
>
> It's more that I don't care. I press 'enter', which indents the arguments
> by a certain amount, then press the 'tab' key until it looks aesthetically
> pleasing.
>
>> FWIW there may be a small merge conflict with net on cls_bpf in patch
>> 5, some of the code has been removed.
>
> Thanks. Dave, do you want to take the IDR patches through your tree to
> save conflict resolution?
Sure, after you fix the indentation problems Jakub pointed out please
resubmit them separately to netdev.
