On 11/29/2017 02:56 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 04:55:39PM -0800, David Daney wrote:
+static int bgx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+       struct mac_platform_data platform_data;
+       const __be32 *reg;
+       u32 port;
+       u64 addr;
+       struct device_node *child;
+       struct platform_device *new_dev;
+       struct platform_device *pki_dev;
+       int numa_node, interface;
+       int i;
+       int r = 0;
+       char id[64];
+       u64 data;
+
+       reg = of_get_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "reg", NULL);
+       addr = of_translate_address(pdev->dev.of_node, reg);
+       interface = (addr >> 24) & 0xf;
+       numa_node = (addr >> 36) & 0x7;

Hi David

You have these two a few times in the code. Maybe add a helper to do
it? The NUMA one i assume could go somewhere in the SoC code?


Thanks for looking at it, I will try with helpers.


The rest of your comments below raise valid points, I will fix those too.




+static int bgx_mix_init_from_fdt(void)
+{
+       struct device_node      *node;
+       struct device_node      *parent = NULL;
+       int                     mix = 0;

+               /* Get the lmac index */
+               reg = of_get_property(lmac_fdt_node, "reg", NULL);
+               if (!reg)
+                       goto err;
+
+               mix_port_lmacs[mix].lmac = *reg;

I don't think of_get_property() deals with endianness. Is there any
danger of this driver being used on hardware with the other endianness
to what you have tested?

+/**
+ * bgx_pki_init_from_param - Initialize the list of lmacs that connect to the
+ *                          pki from information in the "pki_port" parameter.
+ *
+ *                          The pki_port parameter format is as follows:
+ *                          pki_port=nbl
+ *                          where:
+ *                             n = node
+ *                             b = bgx
+ *                             l = lmac
+ *
+ *                          Commas must be used to separate multiple lmacs:
+ *                          pki_port=000,100,110
+ *
+ *                          Asterisks (*) specify all possible characters in
+ *                          the subset:
+ *                          pki_port=00* (all lmacs of node0 bgx0).
+ *
+ *                          Missing lmacs identifiers default to all
+ *                          possible characters in the subset:
+ *                          pki_port=00 (all lmacs on node0 bgx0)
+ *
+ *                          Brackets ('[' and ']') specify the valid
+ *                          characters in the subset:
+ *                          pki_port=00[01] (lmac0 and lmac1 of node0 bgx0).
+ *
+ * Returns 0 if successful.
+ * Returns <0 for error codes.

I've not used kerneldoc much, but i suspect this is wrongly formated:

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.9/kernel-documentation.html#function-documentation

+int bgx_port_ethtool_set_settings(struct net_device    *netdev,
+                                 struct ethtool_cmd    *cmd)
+{
+       struct bgx_port_priv *p = bgx_port_netdev2priv(netdev);
+
+       if (!capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
+               return -EPERM;

Not required. The enforces this. See dev_ethtool()

+
+       if (p->phydev)
+               return phy_ethtool_sset(p->phydev, cmd);
+
+       return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(bgx_port_ethtool_set_settings);
+
+int bgx_port_ethtool_nway_reset(struct net_device *netdev)
+{
+       struct bgx_port_priv *p = bgx_port_netdev2priv(netdev);
+
+       if (!capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
+               return -EPERM;

Also not needed.

+static void bgx_port_adjust_link(struct net_device *netdev)
+{
+       struct bgx_port_priv    *priv = bgx_port_netdev2priv(netdev);
+       bool                    link_changed = false;
+       unsigned int            link;
+       unsigned int            speed;
+       unsigned int            duplex;
+
+       mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
+
+       if (!priv->phydev->link && priv->last_status.link)
+               link_changed = true;
+
+       if (priv->phydev->link &&
+           (priv->last_status.link != priv->phydev->link ||
+            priv->last_status.duplex != priv->phydev->duplex ||
+            priv->last_status.speed != priv->phydev->speed))
+               link_changed = true;
+
+       link = priv->phydev->link;
+       priv->last_status.link = priv->phydev->link;
+
+       speed = priv->phydev->speed;
+       priv->last_status.speed = priv->phydev->speed;
+
+       duplex = priv->phydev->duplex;
+       priv->last_status.duplex = priv->phydev->duplex;
+
+       mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
+
+       if (link_changed) {
+               struct port_status status;
+
+               phy_print_status(priv->phydev);
+
+               status.link = link ? 1 : 0;
+               status.duplex = duplex;
+               status.speed = speed;
+               if (!link) {
+                       netif_carrier_off(netdev);
+                        /* Let TX drain. FIXME check that it is drained. */
+                       mdelay(50);
+               }
+               priv->set_link(priv, status);
+               if (link)
+                       netif_carrier_on(netdev);

The code should do netif_carrier_on/off for you. See phy_link_change()

+static void bgx_port_check_state(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+       struct bgx_port_priv    *priv;
+       struct port_status      status;
+
+       priv = container_of(work, struct bgx_port_priv, dwork.work);
+
+       status = priv->get_link(priv);
+
+       if (!status.link &&
+           priv->mode != PORT_MODE_SGMII && priv->mode != PORT_MODE_RGMII)
+               bgx_port_init_xaui_link(priv);
+
+       if (priv->last_status.link != status.link) {
+               priv->last_status.link = status.link;
+               if (status.link)
+                       netdev_info(priv->netdev, "Link is up - %d/%s\n",
+                                   status.speed,
+                                   status.duplex == DUPLEX_FULL ? "Full" : 
"Half");

You already have phy_print_status() in bgx_port_adjust_link(). Do you need this 
here?

+               else
+                       netdev_info(priv->netdev, "Link is down\n");
+       }
+
+       mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
+       if (priv->work_queued)
+               queue_delayed_work(check_state_wq, &priv->dwork, HZ);
+       mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
+}
+
+int bgx_port_enable(struct net_device *netdev)
+{


+       } else {
+               priv->phydev = of_phy_connect(netdev, priv->phy_np,
+                                             bgx_port_adjust_link, 0, 
priv->phy_mode);
+               if (!priv->phydev)
+                       return -ENODEV;
+
+               netif_carrier_off(netdev);
+
+               if (priv->phydev)

You already checked this above.

+                       phy_start_aneg(priv->phydev);
+       }
+
+       return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(bgx_port_enable);
+
+int bgx_port_change_mtu(struct net_device *netdev, int new_mtu)
+{
+       struct bgx_port_priv *priv = bgx_port_netdev2priv(netdev);
+       int max_frame;
+
+       if (new_mtu < 60 || new_mtu > 65392) {

See dev_set_mtu(). If you have done your initialisation correctly, this
won't happen.

+static int bgx_port_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+       switch (priv->mode) {
+       case PORT_MODE_SGMII:
+               if (priv->phy_np &&
+                   priv->phy_mode != PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII)
+                       dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "SGMII phy mode mismatch.\n");
+               goto set_link_functions;
+       case PORT_MODE_RGMII:
+               if (priv->phy_np &&
+                   priv->phy_mode != PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII &&
+                   priv->phy_mode != PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID &&
+                   priv->phy_mode != PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_RXID &&
+                   priv->phy_mode != PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID)

phy_interface_mode_is_rgmii()

More later, maybe.

      Andrew


Reply via email to