On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 16:41:08 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bige...@linutronix.de> wrote:
> I would keep it for now until we decide if we keep fixing those things > are disable for RT because it is not worth it. As I said, this is only > x86 specific and we have something similar on ARM with NEON. > But I guess the decision here will be postponed until someone posts > numbers with SW and with this workaround and cyclictest with a cycle of > 1 - 10 ms. Fair enough. -- Steve
