As in manpage of migrate_pages, the errno should be set to EINVAL when
none of the node IDs specified by new_nodes are on-line and allowed by the
process's current cpuset context, or none of the specified nodes contain
memory.  However, when test by following case:

        new_nodes = 0;
        old_nodes = 0xf;
        ret = migrate_pages(pid, old_nodes, new_nodes, MAX);

The ret will be 0 and no errno is set.  As the new_nodes is empty, we
should expect EINVAL as documented.

To fix the case like above, this patch check whether target nodes AND
current task_nodes is empty, and then check whether AND
node_states[N_MEMORY] is empty.

Meanwhile,this patch also remove the check of EPERM on CAP_SYS_NICE. 
The caller of migrate_pages should be able to migrate the target process
pages anywhere the caller can allocate memory, if the caller can access
the mm_struct.

Signed-off-by: Yisheng Xie <xieyishe...@huawei.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <a...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Salls <sa...@cs.ucsb.edu>
Cc: Christopher Lameter <c...@linux.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rient...@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horigu...@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Tan Xiaojun <tanxiao...@huawei.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vba...@suse.cz>
---
v3:
 * check whether node is empty after AND current task node, and then nodes
   which have memory
v4:
 * remove the check of EPERM on CAP_SYS_NICE.

Hi Vlastimil and Christopher,

Could you please help to review this version?

Thanks
Yisheng Xie

 mm/mempolicy.c | 13 +++++--------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index 65df28d..4da74b6 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -1426,17 +1426,14 @@ static int copy_nodes_to_user(unsigned long __user 
*mask, unsigned long maxnode,
        }
        rcu_read_unlock();
 
-       task_nodes = cpuset_mems_allowed(task);
-       /* Is the user allowed to access the target nodes? */
-       if (!nodes_subset(*new, task_nodes) && !capable(CAP_SYS_NICE)) {
-               err = -EPERM;
+       task_nodes = cpuset_mems_allowed(current);
+       nodes_and(*new, *new, task_nodes);
+       if (nodes_empty(*new))
                goto out_put;
-       }
 
-       if (!nodes_subset(*new, node_states[N_MEMORY])) {
-               err = -EINVAL;
+       nodes_and(*new, *new, node_states[N_MEMORY]);
+       if (nodes_empty(*new))
                goto out_put;
-       }
 
        err = security_task_movememory(task);
        if (err)
-- 
1.7.12.4

Reply via email to