On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote: > > The classical interpretation of the access(2) system call is "do the same > type of permission check as open(2) would do but using real uid in the > credentials instead of effective (or on Linux fs) uid". .... > All I am saying is that if open on HP/UX allows writing but access denies > it, it is definitely a bug (in HP/UX). Oh, I agree fervently with you and Al on this, just felt my opinion could be left out of it. Hugh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: access() says EROFS even ... Alexander Viro
- Re: access() says EROFS even ... Tigran Aivazian
- Re: access() says EROFS even ... Alexander Viro
- Re: access() says EROFS even ... Olivier Galibert
- Re: access() says EROFS even ... Richard B. Johnson
- Re: access() says EROFS even ... Tigran Aivazian
- Re: access() says EROFS even ... Tigran Aivazian
- Re: access() says EROFS even ... Alexander Viro
- Re: access() says EROFS even ... Tigran Aivazian
- Re: access() says EROFS even ... Tigran Aivazian
- Re: access() says EROFS even ... Hugh Dickins
- Re: access() says EROFS even ... Richard B. Johnson
- Broken NTFS Joseph K. Malek
- Re: Broken NTFS Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: access() says EROFS even for device files if /... Peter Cordes
- Re: access() says EROFS even for device files ... Alexander Viro
- Re: access() says EROFS even for device files if /dev i... Andries . Brouwer