On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 08:45:13PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-12-01 at 13:44 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

[ . . . ]

> > Good points!  Like this?
> []
> > commit ff155ce179aab891dbe2ca80f82a453383fd165a
> > Author: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
> > Date:   Mon Nov 27 09:37:35 2017 -0800
> > 
> >     checkpatch: Add warnings for {smp_,}read_barrier_depends()
> >     
> >     Now that both smp_read_barrier_depends() and read_barrier_depends()
> >     are being de-emphasized, warn if any are added.
> >     
> >     Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
> >     Cc: Andy Whitcroft <[email protected]>
> >     Cc: Joe Perches <[email protected]>
> >     [ paulmck: Skipped checking files and handled whitespace per Joe 
> > Perches. ]
> > 
> > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> []
> > @@ -5586,6 +5586,12 @@ sub process {
> >                     }
> >             }
> >  
> > +# check for smp_read_barrier_depends and read_barrier_depends
> > +           if (!$file && $line =~ /\b(smp_|)read_barrier_depends\s*\(/) {
> > +                   WARN("READ_BARRIER_DEPENDS",
> > +                        "Dependency barriers should only be used in 
> > READ_ONCE or DEC Alpha code" . $herecurr);
> 
> Almost right.  Missing a '\n' after "DEC Alpha code".
> Without the '\n', running checkpatch with --terse outputs badly.
> 
> If you really wanted to optimize, you could make the first (smp_|)
> become (?:smp_|) to avoid the unused capture group.
> Or perhaps this could emit the actual type in the message like:
> 
>               if (!$file && $line =~ /\b((?:smp_|)read_barrier_depends)\s*\(/ 
> {
>                       WARN("READ_BARRIER_DEPENDS",
>                            "$1 should only be used in READ_ONCE or DEC Alpha 
> code\n" . $herecurr);

How about like this?  (s/$1/$1read_barrier_depends/).

                                                        Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

commit e4f1d781e33c150547c68e55099794b98ee14d5e
Author: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
Date:   Mon Nov 27 09:37:35 2017 -0800

    checkpatch: Add warnings for {smp_,}read_barrier_depends()
    
    Now that both smp_read_barrier_depends() and read_barrier_depends()
    are being de-emphasized, warn if any are added.
    
    Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
    Cc: Andy Whitcroft <[email protected]>
    Cc: Joe Perches <[email protected]>
    [ paulmck: Skipped checking files and handled whitespace per Joe Perches. ]

diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 95cda3ecc66b..9a384bfe2bd5 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -5586,6 +5586,12 @@ sub process {
                        }
                }
 
+# check for smp_read_barrier_depends and read_barrier_depends
+               if (!$file && $line =~ /\b(smp_|)read_barrier_depends\s*\(/) {
+                       WARN("READ_BARRIER_DEPENDS",
+                            "$1read_barrier_depends should only be used in 
READ_ONCE or DEC Alpha code\n" . $herecurr);
+               }
+
 # check of hardware specific defines
                if ($line =~ 
m@^.\s*\#\s*if.*\b(__i386__|__powerpc64__|__sun__|__s390x__)\b@ && $realfile !~ 
m@include/asm-@) {
                        CHK("ARCH_DEFINES",

Reply via email to