On May 10 2007 16:49, Bodo Eggert wrote: > >Just because you limit yourself to 80 chars minus "ls -l"-clutter, this is >no reason why I shouldn't use long filenames. If I need to handle these >filenames, I can enlarge the terminal window or read the next line. > >E.g.: I have a music file named "artist - title.ext", where the artist >name is 103 characters long, using abbreviations. In order to enter that >name, I have to press seven keys, including the escape character. >There is nothing unreasonable in using that name.
What name would that be? I cannot dream up any IME that outputs _that_ many characters for that few keystrokes. Even with CJ(K), 7 keystrokes can make at most 21 bytes if I had to take a good guess. Jan -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/