On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 11:09:24AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote: >On 12/07/17 at 10:53am, Chao Fan wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 05:35:57PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote: >> >Hi Chao, >> > >> >Yes, now the code looks much better than the last version. >> > >> >On 12/05/17 at 04:51pm, Chao Fan wrote: >> >> In current code, kaslr may choose the memory region in movable >> >> nodes to extract kernel, which will make the nodes can't be hot-removed. >> >> To solve it, we can specify the memory region in immovable node. >> >> Create immovable_mem to store the regions in immovable_mem, where should >> >> be chosen by kaslr. >> >> >> >> Multiple regions can be specified, comma delimited. >> >> Considering the usage of memory, only support for 4 regions. >> >> 4 regions contains 2 nodes at least, enough for kernel to extract. >> >> >> >> Also change the "handle_mem_memmap" to "handle_mem_filter", since >> >> it will not only handle memmap parameter now. >> > >> >One concern is whether it will fail to do KASLR if only specify >> >> Sorry, I think I have not understood your point. >> So if there is something wrong, please let me know. > >What I meant is whether we need check 'movable_node' and >'immovable_mem=' being specified together. If only specify 'movable_node', >we may need to return and do not do kaslr or do not do physical kaslr >since kernel could be located on movable mem region.
I think both are OK and have reasons, and I tend to not return. Because if there is a parameter can solve the problem, but not specified. It's a problem of user-level. How do you think? Thanks, Chao Fan > >Otherwise it will do physical kaslr anyway, memory hotplug will be >impacted later. > >> >> I don't think if only specify "movable_node" will fail KASLR. >> Since in this patchset(3/4), only disable kernel mirror. KASLR in >> current upstream code didn't parse "movable_node". >> >> >"movable_node". Surely in this case it won't fail system, just hotplug >> >memory might be impacted if kernel is located on that, will FJ mind >> >> Yes, it's the reason why I make this patchset. >> In my personal understanding, "movable_node" is a beginning why I make >> this patchset, but not the whole reason. >> Only "movable_node" specified might cause hotplug memory can't be >> removed if kernel is located on that, so we need the help of >> "immovable_mem=". "movable_node" help hotplug memory can be removed, and >> "immovable_mem=" works for the same target, but just in kaslr. >> So up to now, there is not a very tight coupling between "movable_node" >> and "immovable_mem=". The independence of "immovable_mem=" is that, >> help kaslr selects the right regions, avoid the memory in hotpluggable >> NUMA nodes, which causes the memory can't removed. It's a independent >> reason why we need a parameter like "immovable_mem=". >> So I think we should also handle it if only specify "immovable_mem=" >> without "movable_node". >> >> Thanks, >> Chao Fan >> >> >this? And what if only specify 'immovable_mem=' but without 'movable_node'? >> > >> >Thanks >> >Baoquan >> > >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Chao Fan <fanc.f...@cn.fujitsu.com> >> >> --- >> >> arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c | 80 >> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- >> >> 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c >> >> b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c >> >> index a63fbc25ce84..0bbbaf5f6370 100644 >> >> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c >> >> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c >> >> @@ -108,6 +108,15 @@ enum mem_avoid_index { >> >> >> >> static struct mem_vector mem_avoid[MEM_AVOID_MAX]; >> >> >> >> +/* Only supporting at most 4 immovable memory regions with kaslr */ >> >> +#define MAX_IMMOVABLE_MEM 4 >> >> + >> >> +/* Store the memory regions in immovable node */ >> >> +static struct mem_vector immovable_mem[MAX_IMMOVABLE_MEM]; >> >> + >> >> +/* The immovable regions user specify, not more than 4 */ >> >> +static int num_immovable_region; >> >> + >> >> static bool mem_overlaps(struct mem_vector *one, struct mem_vector *two) >> >> { >> >> /* Item one is entirely before item two. */ >> >> @@ -168,6 +177,38 @@ parse_memmap(char *p, unsigned long long *start, >> >> unsigned long long *size) >> >> return -EINVAL; >> >> } >> >> >> >> +static int parse_immovable_mem(char *p, >> >> + unsigned long long *start, >> >> + unsigned long long *size) >> >> +{ >> >> + char *oldp; >> >> + >> >> + if (!p) >> >> + return -EINVAL; >> >> + >> >> + oldp = p; >> >> + *size = memparse(p, &p); >> >> + if (p == oldp) >> >> + return -EINVAL; >> >> + >> >> + /* We support nn[KMG]@ss[KMG] and nn[KMG]. */ >> >> + switch (*p) { >> >> + case '@': >> >> + *start = memparse(p + 1, &p); >> >> + return 0; >> >> + default: >> >> + /* >> >> + * If w/o offset, only size specified, immovable_mem=nn[KMG] >> >> + * has the same behaviour as immovable_mem=nn[KMG]@0. It means >> >> + * the region starts from 0. >> >> + */ >> >> + *start = 0; >> >> + return 0; >> >> + } >> >> + >> >> + return -EINVAL; >> >> +} >> >> + >> >> static void mem_avoid_memmap(char *str) >> >> { >> >> static int i; >> >> @@ -207,7 +248,37 @@ static void mem_avoid_memmap(char *str) >> >> memmap_too_large = true; >> >> } >> >> >> >> -static int handle_mem_memmap(void) >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG >> >> +static void parse_immovable_mem_regions(char *str) >> >> +{ >> >> + static int i; >> >> + >> >> + while (str && (i < MAX_IMMOVABLE_MEM)) { >> >> + int rc; >> >> + unsigned long long start, size; >> >> + char *k = strchr(str, ','); >> >> + >> >> + if (k) >> >> + *k++ = 0; >> >> + >> >> + rc = parse_immovable_mem(str, &start, &size); >> >> + if (rc < 0) >> >> + break; >> >> + str = k; >> >> + >> >> + immovable_mem[i].start = start; >> >> + immovable_mem[i].size = size; >> >> + i++; >> >> + } >> >> + num_immovable_region = i; >> >> +} >> >> +#else >> >> +static inline void parse_immovable_mem_regions(char *str) >> >> +{ >> >> +} >> >> +#endif >> >> + >> >> +static int handle_mem_filter(void) >> >> { >> >> char *args = (char *)get_cmd_line_ptr(); >> >> size_t len = strlen((char *)args); >> >> @@ -215,7 +286,8 @@ static int handle_mem_memmap(void) >> >> char *param, *val; >> >> u64 mem_size; >> >> >> >> - if (!strstr(args, "memmap=") && !strstr(args, "mem=")) >> >> + if (!strstr(args, "memmap=") && !strstr(args, "mem=") && >> >> + !strstr(args, "immovable_mem=")) >> >> return 0; >> >> >> >> tmp_cmdline = malloc(len + 1); >> >> @@ -240,6 +312,8 @@ static int handle_mem_memmap(void) >> >> >> >> if (!strcmp(param, "memmap")) { >> >> mem_avoid_memmap(val); >> >> + } else if (!strcmp(param, "immovable_mem")) { >> >> + parse_immovable_mem_regions(val); >> >> } else if (!strcmp(param, "mem")) { >> >> char *p = val; >> >> >> >> @@ -379,7 +453,7 @@ static void mem_avoid_init(unsigned long input, >> >> unsigned long input_size, >> >> /* We don't need to set a mapping for setup_data. */ >> >> >> >> /* Mark the memmap regions we need to avoid */ >> >> - handle_mem_memmap(); >> >> + handle_mem_filter(); >> >> >> >> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_VERBOSE_BOOTUP >> >> /* Make sure video RAM can be used. */ >> >> -- >> >> 2.14.3 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >> > >