4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dave Hansen <dave.han...@linux.intel.com>


[ Upstream commit da20ab35180780e4a6eadc804544f1fa967f3567 ]

We do not have tracepoints for sys_modify_ldt() because we define
it directly instead of using the normal SYSCALL_DEFINEx() macros.

However, there is a reason sys_modify_ldt() does not use the macros:
it has an 'int' return type instead of 'unsigned long'.  This is
a bug, but it's a bug cemented in the ABI.

What does this mean?  If we return -EINVAL from a function that
returns 'int', we have 0x00000000ffffffea in %rax.  But, if we
return -EINVAL from a function returning 'unsigned long', we end
up with 0xffffffffffffffea in %rax, which is wrong.

To work around this and maintain the 'int' behavior while using
the SYSCALL_DEFINEx() macros, so we add a cast to 'unsigned int'
in both implementations of sys_modify_ldt().

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.han...@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Brian Gerst <brge...@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171018172107.1a79c...@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.le...@verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/syscalls.h |    2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c           |   16 +++++++++++++---
 arch/x86/um/ldt.c               |    7 +++++--
 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/syscalls.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/syscalls.h
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_ioperm(unsigned long
 asmlinkage long sys_iopl(unsigned int);
 
 /* kernel/ldt.c */
-asmlinkage int sys_modify_ldt(int, void __user *, unsigned long);
+asmlinkage long sys_modify_ldt(int, void __user *, unsigned long);
 
 /* kernel/signal.c */
 asmlinkage long sys_rt_sigreturn(void);
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ldt.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 #include <linux/string.h>
 #include <linux/mm.h>
 #include <linux/smp.h>
+#include <linux/syscalls.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
@@ -295,8 +296,8 @@ out:
        return error;
 }
 
-asmlinkage int sys_modify_ldt(int func, void __user *ptr,
-                             unsigned long bytecount)
+SYSCALL_DEFINE3(modify_ldt, int , func , void __user * , ptr ,
+               unsigned long , bytecount)
 {
        int ret = -ENOSYS;
 
@@ -314,5 +315,14 @@ asmlinkage int sys_modify_ldt(int func,
                ret = write_ldt(ptr, bytecount, 0);
                break;
        }
-       return ret;
+       /*
+        * The SYSCALL_DEFINE() macros give us an 'unsigned long'
+        * return type, but tht ABI for sys_modify_ldt() expects
+        * 'int'.  This cast gives us an int-sized value in %rax
+        * for the return code.  The 'unsigned' is necessary so
+        * the compiler does not try to sign-extend the negative
+        * return codes into the high half of the register when
+        * taking the value from int->long.
+        */
+       return (unsigned int)ret;
 }
--- a/arch/x86/um/ldt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/um/ldt.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 #include <linux/mm.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/syscalls.h>
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include <asm/unistd.h>
 #include <os.h>
@@ -369,7 +370,9 @@ void free_ldt(struct mm_context *mm)
        mm->arch.ldt.entry_count = 0;
 }
 
-int sys_modify_ldt(int func, void __user *ptr, unsigned long bytecount)
+SYSCALL_DEFINE3(modify_ldt, int , func , void __user * , ptr ,
+               unsigned long , bytecount)
 {
-       return do_modify_ldt_skas(func, ptr, bytecount);
+       /* See non-um modify_ldt() for why we do this cast */
+       return (unsigned int)do_modify_ldt_skas(func, ptr, bytecount);
 }


Reply via email to