Em Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 11:24:47AM -0600, Paul Clarke escreveu: > On 12/07/2017 10:56 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 04:20:28PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu: > > See also Paul Clarke's question and suggestion, which I agree, i.e. > > instead of chopping off the version, just replace the chars with valid > > ones or better, do what Paul suggests, be more flexible in interpreting > > @, i.e. if it is a number and/or fails to point to any file, interpret > > it as versioning. > It's a nit, and subjective, but I'd favor checking for versioning > first, then file. The namespaces are very unlikely to intersect, but > I could foresee symbols like "sym@implA.c" and "sym@implB.c" more > likely than a symbol in a file "GLIBC_2.2.5". > Perhaps straying toward bikeshedding...
Nah, those are valid concerns, and I share them. - Arnaldo
