On Thu, 10 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > Christoph, can we please take a look at /proc/slabinfo and its slub > equivalent (I forget what that is?) and review any and all changes to the > underlying allocation size for each cache? > > Because this is *not* something we should change lightly.
It was changed specially for mm in order to stress the antifrag code. If this causes trouble then do not merge the patches against SLUB that exploit the antifrag methods. This failure should help see how effective Mel's antifrag patches are. He needs to get on this dicussion. Upstream has slub_max_order=1. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
