On 12/08/2017 12:04 AM, Dan Murphy wrote: > Rob > > > On 12/07/2017 04:49 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 02:46:29PM -0600, Dan Murphy wrote: >>> This adds the devicetree bindings for the LM3692x >>> I2C LED string driver. >>> >>> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pa...@ucw.cz> >>> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmur...@ti.com> >>> --- >>> >>> v8 - Added address-cells and size-cells as well as child node reg - >>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10091259/ >>> v7 - No changes - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10087475/ >>> v6 - No changes -https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10085567/ >>> v5 - No Changes - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10081071/ >>> v4 - Fix example node, added trigger entry, removed ambiguous x for >>> compatible and >>> added common.txt pointer for label - >>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10060107 >>> v3 - No changes >>> v2 - No changes - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10056677/ >>> >>> .../devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lm3692x.txt | 47 >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lm3692x.txt >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lm3692x.txt >>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lm3692x.txt >>> new file mode 100644 >>> index 000000000000..84f69342d879 >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lm3692x.txt >>> @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ >>> +* Texas Instruments - LM3692x Highly Efficient White LED Driver >>> + >>> +The LM3692x is an ultra-compact, highly efficient, >>> +white-LED driver designed for LCD display backlighting. >>> + >>> +The main difference between the LM36922 and LM36923 is the number of >>> +LED strings it supports. The LM36922 supports two strings while the >>> LM36923 >>> +supports three strings. >>> + >>> +Required properties: >>> + - compatible: >>> + "ti,lm36922" >>> + "ti,lm36923" >>> + - reg : I2C slave address >>> + - #address-cells : 1 >>> + - #size-cells : 0 >>> + >>> +Optional properties: >>> + - label : see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt >> >> Should be a child prop. > > Thanks I forgot to move this to Optional Child Properties. > >> >>> + - enable-gpios : gpio pin to enable/disable the device. >>> + - vled-supply : LED supply >>> + - linux,default-trigger : (optional) >>> + see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt >> >> Ditto. > > Ack > >> >>> + >>> +Required child properties: >>> + - reg : 0 >>> + >>> +Example: >>> + >>> +lm3692x@36 { >> >> leds@36 > > Rob why does this need to be leds? Is this because it would be a child of an > I2C node? > > Jacek > Would this not cause and issue for your proposal to take the parent node name > as part of the LED label?
Yes, it would. Rob, does something prevent us from adding a requirement that LED controller DT node has to contain the chip name (besides the unit address)? Many current LED controller nodes apply this pattern. Also, I would appreciate if you could express your opinion on the patch [0]. [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10089047/ -- Best regards, Jacek Anaszewski