On 12/08/2017 12:04 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Rob
> 
> 
> On 12/07/2017 04:49 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 02:46:29PM -0600, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>> This adds the devicetree bindings for the LM3692x
>>> I2C LED string driver.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pa...@ucw.cz>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmur...@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> v8 - Added address-cells and size-cells as well as child node reg - 
>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10091259/
>>> v7 - No changes - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10087475/
>>> v6 - No changes -https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10085567/
>>> v5 - No Changes - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10081071/
>>> v4 - Fix example node, added trigger entry, removed ambiguous x for 
>>> compatible and
>>> added common.txt pointer for label - 
>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10060107
>>> v3 - No changes
>>> v2 - No changes - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10056677/
>>>
>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lm3692x.txt      | 47 
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lm3692x.txt
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lm3692x.txt 
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lm3692x.txt
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..84f69342d879
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lm3692x.txt
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
>>> +* Texas Instruments - LM3692x Highly Efficient White LED Driver
>>> +
>>> +The LM3692x is an ultra-compact, highly efficient,
>>> +white-LED driver designed for LCD display backlighting.
>>> +
>>> +The main difference between the LM36922 and LM36923 is the number of
>>> +LED strings it supports.  The LM36922 supports two strings while the 
>>> LM36923
>>> +supports three strings.
>>> +
>>> +Required properties:
>>> +   - compatible:
>>> +           "ti,lm36922"
>>> +           "ti,lm36923"
>>> +   - reg :  I2C slave address
>>> +   - #address-cells : 1
>>> +   - #size-cells : 0
>>> +
>>> +Optional properties:
>>> +   - label : see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt
>>
>> Should be a child prop.
> 
> Thanks I forgot to move this to Optional Child Properties.
> 
>>
>>> +   - enable-gpios : gpio pin to enable/disable the device.
>>> +   - vled-supply : LED supply
>>> +   - linux,default-trigger : (optional)
>>> +      see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt
>>
>> Ditto.
> 
> Ack
> 
>>
>>> +
>>> +Required child properties:
>>> +   - reg : 0
>>> +
>>> +Example:
>>> +
>>> +lm3692x@36 {
>>
>> leds@36
> 
> Rob why does this need to be leds?  Is this because it would be a child of an 
> I2C node?
> 
> Jacek
> Would this not cause and issue for your proposal to take the parent node name 
> as part of the LED label?

Yes, it would.

Rob, does something prevent us from adding a requirement that
LED controller DT node has to contain the chip name (besides the
unit address)? Many current LED controller nodes apply this pattern.

Also, I would appreciate if you could express your opinion on
the patch [0].

[0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10089047/

-- 
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski

Reply via email to