On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Anything else we can do to move this? I just had to resolve a small > > conflict when moving forward to -rc3. Carrying a revert for the entire > > apic pull (too many deps to just revert the bisected patch) is a bit > > annoying. > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.20.1712081129450.1840@nanos
Another question. Is this broken on mainline or just with your new bits
targeted for next?
Thanks,
tglx
