* Prarit Bhargava <[email protected]> wrote: > The ACPI SPCR code has been used to define an earlycon console for ARM64 > and can be used for x86. > > Modify the ACPI SPCR parsing code to account for console behaviour > differences between ARM64 and x86. Initialize the SPCR code from > x86 ACPI initialization code. > > Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Cc: Bhupesh Sharma <[email protected]> > Cc: Lv Zheng <[email protected]> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> > Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Cc: Jonathan Corbet <[email protected]> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> > Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]> > Cc: Timur Tabi <[email protected]> > --- > Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 3 +++ > arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c | 2 +- > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 4 ++++ > drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 2 +- > drivers/acpi/spcr.c | 7 +++++-- > include/linux/acpi.h | 7 +++++-- > 6 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
LGTM from an x86 perspective: Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> (assuming it causes no regressions in linux-next.) Since patch #1 affects ARM64 significantly, once that patch is acceptable to the arm64 folks feel free to upstream this second patch via the ARM64 tree as well. Thanks, Ingo
