> -----Original Message----- > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org] > Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2017 4:27 PM > To: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchi...@codethink.co.uk>; Ghannam, Yazen > <yazen.ghan...@amd.com> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; sta...@vger.kernel.org; Matt Fleming > <m...@codeblueprint.co.uk>; Borislav Petkov <b...@suse.de>; Andrew > Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>; Andy Lutomirski > <l...@amacapital.net>; Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org>; Ard Biesheuvel > <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>; Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de>; Brian Gerst > <brge...@gmail.com>; Dave Jones <da...@codemonkey.org.uk>; Denys > Vlasenko <dvlas...@redhat.com>; H. Peter Anvin <h...@zytor.com>; Linus > Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>; Peter Zijlstra > <pet...@infradead.org>; Sai Praneeth Prakhya > <sai.praneeth.prak...@intel.com>; Stephen Smalley <s...@tycho.nsa.gov>; > Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>; Toshi Kani <toshi.k...@hp.com>; > linux-...@vger.kernel.org; Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>; Ghannam, > Yazen <yazen.ghan...@amd.com>; Alex Thorlton <athorl...@sgi.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 05/27] x86/efi: Build our own page table structures > > On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 10:43:49PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 16:59 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me > know. > > > > > > ------------------ > > > > > > From: Matt Fleming <m...@codeblueprint.co.uk> > > > > > > commit 67a9108ed4313b85a9c53406d80dc1ae3f8c3e36 upstream. > > [...] > > > > It looks like this will cause regressions unless you also apply: > > > > 21cdb6b56843 x86/mm: Page align the '_end' symbol to avoid pfn > conversion bugs > > b61a76f8850d x86/efi: Map RAM into the identity page table for mixed > mode > > 753b11ef8e92 x86/efi: Setup separate EFI page tables in kexec paths > > > > and possibly also: > > > > 08914f436bdd x86/platform/UV: Bring back the call to map_low_mmrs in > uv_system_init > > 683ad8092cd2 x86/efi: Fix 7-parameter efi_call()s > > 80e75596079f efi: Convert efi_call_virt() to efi_call_virt_pointer() > > d1be84a232e3 x86/uv: Update uv_bios_call() to use efi_call_virt_pointer() > > Ugh, that's a mess. Yazen is the one who reported this patch, and 2 > others, were needed to resolve an issue on their hardware. > > Yazen, any thoughts here? Should I just revert the 3 patches, or do you > also feel I need all 7 of these to ensure everything works properly? >
I think it's okay to revert the 3 patches. Thanks, Yazen
