Hi,
Sorry for late reply.
On 12/08/2017 04:19 AM, Mehta, Sohil wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-12-06 at 16:16 +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 12/06/2017 11:43 AM, Sohil Mehta wrote:
>>> From: Gayatri Kammela <gayatri.kamm...@intel.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> + seq_printf(m, "%s Context table entries for Bus: %d\n",
>>> + ext ? "Lower" : "", bus);
>>> + seq_printf(m, "[entry]\tDID :B :D .F\tLow\t\tHigh\n");
>> WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf
>> #119: FILE: drivers/iommu/intel-iommu-debug.c:59:
>> + seq_printf(m, "[entry]\tDID :B :D .F\tLow\t\tHigh\n");
>>
>> (caught by checkpatch.pl)
>>
> Hi Lu,
>
> We'll fix this and the other checkpatch.pl warnings.
>
>
>>> +
>>> +static void root_tbl_entry_show(struct seq_file *m, void *unused,
>> Why do you define the "unused" parameter which will never been used?
>> The same questions to other show functions.
>>
> Some functions in our code that are registered with seq_file needed to
> have an unused parameter since seq_file.h defines the show function as:
> int (*show) (struct seq_file *m, void *v);
>
> But a lot of other functions including the one you pointed don't need
> to have the unused parameter. We'll remove it from those.
>
>
>>> +void __init intel_iommu_debugfs_init(void)
>>> +{
>>> + struct dentry *iommu_debug_root;
>>> +
>>> + iommu_debug_root = debugfs_create_dir("intel_iommu",
>>> NULL);
>>> +
>>> + if (!iommu_debug_root) {
>>> + pr_err("can't create debugfs dir\n");
>> I don't think we need a pr_err() here. System works well even
>> debugfs_create_dir() returns NULL.
>>
>> This is same to all pr_err() in this file.
>>
> Would the recommendation be to use pr_warn instead of pr_err or should
> we entirely skip the message altogether?
Greg ever educated me about the use of debugfs_ functions in
this thread.
https://spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg159384.html
At least we should avoid the warning/error messages here.
Best regards,
Lu Baolu
