On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 08:03:11AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-12-11 at 21:55 -0500, Yaowei Bai wrote:
> > This patch makes memblock_is_map/region_memory return bool due to these
> > two functions only using either true or false as its return value.
> []
> > @@ -1690,13 +1690,13 @@ int __init_memblock 
> > memblock_search_pfn_nid(unsigned long pfn,
> >   * RETURNS:
> >   * 0 if false, non-zero if true
> >   */
> > -int __init_memblock memblock_is_region_memory(phys_addr_t base, 
> > phys_addr_t size)
> > +bool __init_memblock memblock_is_region_memory(phys_addr_t base, 
> > phys_addr_t size)
> >  {
> >     int idx = memblock_search(&memblock.memory, base);
> >     phys_addr_t end = base + memblock_cap_size(base, &size);
> >  
> >     if (idx == -1)
> > -           return 0;
> > +           return false;
> >     return (memblock.memory.regions[idx].base +
> >              memblock.memory.regions[idx].size) >= end;
> >  }
> 
> I'd be more inclined to use a temporary for
> memblock.memory.regions[idx] so the function was
> something like:
> 
> int __init_memblock memblock_is_region_memory(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t 
> size)
> {
>       phys_addr_t end;
>       struct memblock_region *region;
>       int idx = memblock_search(&memblock.memory, base);
> 
>       if (idx == -1)
>               return 0;
> 
>       end = base + memblock_cap_size(base, &size);
>       region = &memblock.memory.regions[idx];
> 
>       return (region->base + region->size) >= end;
> }

It' better.

> 
> Maybe change to bool at your option.

Ok. You also can ack this one first. :)


Reply via email to