Recent libcs have gotten a bit more strict, so we actually need to
include the right headers and use the right types. This enables UML to
compile again.

Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <ja...@zx2c4.com>
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
---
 arch/um/os-Linux/file.c   | 1 +
 arch/um/os-Linux/signal.c | 3 ++-
 arch/x86/um/stub_segv.c   | 3 ++-
 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/um/os-Linux/file.c b/arch/um/os-Linux/file.c
index 2db18cbbb0ea..c0197097c86e 100644
--- a/arch/um/os-Linux/file.c
+++ b/arch/um/os-Linux/file.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 #include <sys/mount.h>
 #include <sys/socket.h>
 #include <sys/stat.h>
+#include <sys/sysmacros.h>
 #include <sys/un.h>
 #include <sys/types.h>
 #include <os.h>
diff --git a/arch/um/os-Linux/signal.c b/arch/um/os-Linux/signal.c
index a86d7cc2c2d8..bf0acb8aad8b 100644
--- a/arch/um/os-Linux/signal.c
+++ b/arch/um/os-Linux/signal.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 #include <os.h>
 #include <sysdep/mcontext.h>
 #include <um_malloc.h>
+#include <sys/ucontext.h>
 
 void (*sig_info[NSIG])(int, struct siginfo *, struct uml_pt_regs *) = {
        [SIGTRAP]       = relay_signal,
@@ -159,7 +160,7 @@ static void (*handlers[_NSIG])(int sig, struct siginfo *si, 
mcontext_t *mc) = {
 
 static void hard_handler(int sig, siginfo_t *si, void *p)
 {
-       struct ucontext *uc = p;
+       ucontext_t *uc = p;
        mcontext_t *mc = &uc->uc_mcontext;
        unsigned long pending = 1UL << sig;
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/um/stub_segv.c b/arch/x86/um/stub_segv.c
index 1518d2805ae8..27361cbb7ca9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/um/stub_segv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/um/stub_segv.c
@@ -6,11 +6,12 @@
 #include <sysdep/stub.h>
 #include <sysdep/faultinfo.h>
 #include <sysdep/mcontext.h>
+#include <sys/ucontext.h>
 
 void __attribute__ ((__section__ (".__syscall_stub")))
 stub_segv_handler(int sig, siginfo_t *info, void *p)
 {
-       struct ucontext *uc = p;
+       ucontext_t *uc = p;
 
        GET_FAULTINFO_FROM_MC(*((struct faultinfo *) STUB_DATA),
                              &uc->uc_mcontext);
-- 
2.15.1

Reply via email to