On Fri, 11 May 2007 17:53:35 -0700 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And indeed that's buggy - the non-debug version of spin_lock_mutex() is not > irq-safe. > > I'd say that's pretty dumb of the mutex interface, really. Doing a > mutex_trylock() should be OK from all contexts. We can fix this in a low-impact fashion by making mutex_trylock() do a spin_trylock() on mutex->wait_lock, no? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
