On 30-11-17, 12:29, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 29-11-17, 16:50, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Sorry it still makes zero sense to me. It seems that we're trying > > to make the OPP table parsing generic just for the sake of code > > brevity. > > Not just the code but bindings as well to make sure we don't add a new > property (similar to earlier ones) for every platform that wants to > use performance states.
@Stephen: Do you have any feedback on my previous email? If no, then I would like to refresh this version with the feedback received from Rob. -- viresh
