On Tue, 2017-12-12 at 11:01 -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> rules. Unfortunatley, it contains quite a few holes.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Unfortunately?
> While this change makes REQ_ATOM_COMPLETE synchornization unnecessary
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
synchronization?
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -126,6 +126,8 @@ void blk_rq_init(struct request_queue *q, struct request
> *rq)
> rq->start_time = jiffies;
> set_start_time_ns(rq);
> rq->part = NULL;
> + seqcount_init(&rq->gstate_seq);
> + u64_stats_init(&rq->aborted_gstate_sync);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_rq_init);
Sorry but the above change looks ugly to me. My understanding is that
blk_rq_init() is only used inside the block layer to initialize legacy block
layer requests while gstate_seq and aborted_gstate_sync are only relevant
for blk-mq requests. Wouldn't it be better to avoid that blk_rq_init() is
called for blk-mq requests such that the above change can be left out? The
only callers outside the block layer core of blk_rq_init() I know of are
ide_prep_sense() and scsi_ioctl_reset(). I can help with converting the SCSI
code if you want.
> + write_seqcount_begin(&rq->gstate_seq);
> + blk_mq_rq_update_state(rq, MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT);
> + blk_add_timer(rq);
> + write_seqcount_end(&rq->gstate_seq);
My understanding is that both write_seqcount_begin() and write_seqcount_end()
trigger a write memory barrier. Is a seqcount really faster than a spinlock?
>
> @@ -792,6 +811,14 @@ void blk_mq_rq_timed_out(struct request *req, bool
> reserved)
> __blk_mq_complete_request(req);
> break;
> case BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER:
> + /*
> + * As nothing prevents from completion happening while
> + * ->aborted_gstate is set, this may lead to ignored
> + * completions and further spurious timeouts.
> + */
> + u64_stats_update_begin(&req->aborted_gstate_sync);
> + req->aborted_gstate = 0;
> + u64_stats_update_end(&req->aborted_gstate_sync);
If a blk-mq request is resubmitted 2**62 times, can that result in the above
code setting aborted_gstate to the same value as gstate? Isn't that a bug?
If so, how about setting aborted_gstate in the above code to e.g. gstate ^
(2**63)?
> @@ -228,6 +230,27 @@ struct request {
>
> unsigned short write_hint;
>
> + /*
> + * On blk-mq, the lower bits of ->gstate carry the MQ_RQ_* state
> + * value and the upper bits the generation number which is
> + * monotonically incremented and used to distinguish the reuse
> + * instances.
> + *
> + * ->gstate_seq allows updates to ->gstate and other fields
> + * (currently ->deadline) during request start to be read
> + * atomically from the timeout path, so that it can operate on a
> + * coherent set of information.
> + */
> + seqcount_t gstate_seq;
> + u64 gstate;
> +
> + /*
> + * ->aborted_gstate is used by the timeout to claim a specific
> + * recycle instance of this request. See blk_mq_timeout_work().
> + */
> + struct u64_stats_sync aborted_gstate_sync;
> + u64 aborted_gstate;
> +
> unsigned long deadline;
> struct list_head timeout_list;
Why are gstate and aborted_gstate 64-bit variables? What makes you think that
32 bits would not be enough?
Thanks,
Bart.
