On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 09:09:15AM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Following commit 9427ecbed46cc ("gpio: Rework of_gpiochip_set_names()
> to use device property accessors"), "gpio-line-names" DT property is
> not retrieved anymore when chip->parent is not set by the driver.

Thanks for taking care of this and sorry about the breakage.

I think this changelog should have few more words about the reason it
started to fail.

> This patch fixes that.
> 
> Fixes: 9427ecbed46cc ("gpio: Rework of_gpiochip_set_names()
> to use device property accessors")

Don't wrap the Fixes line.

> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib-devprop.c | 16 ++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-devprop.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-devprop.c
> index 27f383bda7d9..310dbc451a85 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-devprop.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-devprop.c
> @@ -30,20 +30,24 @@ void devprop_gpiochip_set_names(struct gpio_chip *chip)
>       struct gpio_device *gdev = chip->gpiodev;
>       const char **names;
>       int ret, i;
> +     struct device *dev;
>  
> -     if (!chip->parent) {
> +     if (chip->parent) {
> +             dev = chip->parent;
> +     } else if (gdev->dev.of_node) {
> +             dev = &gdev->dev;
> +     } else {

I wonder if it would be better to change devprop_gpiochip_set_names()
take struct fwnode_handle as second parameter and use that instead of
chip->parent below? The reason why this happens now is that not all DT
enabled drivers seem to set chip->parent (which I guess is pretty valid
thing to do) but they still set of_node accordingly.

>               dev_warn(&gdev->dev, "GPIO chip parent is NULL\n");
>               return;
>       }
>  
> -     ret = device_property_read_string_array(chip->parent, "gpio-line-names",
> +     ret = device_property_read_string_array(dev, "gpio-line-names",
>                                               NULL, 0);
>       if (ret < 0)
>               return;
>  
>       if (ret != gdev->ngpio) {
> -             dev_warn(chip->parent,
> -                      "names %d do not match number of GPIOs %d\n", ret,
> +             dev_warn(dev, "names %d do not match number of GPIOs %d\n", ret,
>                        gdev->ngpio);
>               return;
>       }
> @@ -52,10 +56,10 @@ void devprop_gpiochip_set_names(struct gpio_chip *chip)
>       if (!names)
>               return;
>  
> -     ret = device_property_read_string_array(chip->parent, "gpio-line-names",
> +     ret = device_property_read_string_array(dev, "gpio-line-names",
>                                               names, gdev->ngpio);
>       if (ret < 0) {
> -             dev_warn(chip->parent, "failed to read GPIO line names\n");
> +             dev_warn(dev, "failed to read GPIO line names\n");
>               kfree(names);
>               return;
>       }
> -- 
> 2.13.3

Reply via email to