From: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>

Since uv_flush_tlb_others() implements flush_tlb_others() which is
about flushing user mappings, we should use __flush_tlb_single(),
which too is about flushing user mappings.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Andrew Banman <aban...@hpe.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <b...@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brge...@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.han...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Laight <david.lai...@aculab.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlas...@redhat.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edu...@amazon.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <h...@zytor.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoim...@redhat.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgr...@suse.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Travis <mike.tra...@hpe.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
Cc: aligu...@amazon.com
Cc: daniel.gr...@iaik.tugraz.at
Cc: hu...@google.com
Cc: keesc...@google.com
Cc: linux...@kvack.org
---
 arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static void bau_process_message(struct m
                local_flush_tlb();
                stat->d_alltlb++;
        } else {
-               __flush_tlb_one(msg->address);
+               __flush_tlb_single(msg->address);
                stat->d_onetlb++;
        }
        stat->d_requestee++;


Reply via email to