4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Doug Berger <[email protected]>


[ Upstream commit eca4bad73409aedc6ff22f823c18b67a4f08c851 ]

The reserved gphy_rev value of 0x01ff must be tested before the old
or new scheme for GPHY major versioning are tested, otherwise it will
be treated as 0xff00 according to the old scheme.

Fixes: b04a2f5b9ff5 ("net: bcmgenet: add support for new GENET PHY revision 
scheme")
Signed-off-by: Doug Berger <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c |   12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c
@@ -3233,6 +3233,12 @@ static void bcmgenet_set_hw_params(struc
         */
        gphy_rev = reg & 0xffff;
 
+       /* This is reserved so should require special treatment */
+       if (gphy_rev == 0 || gphy_rev == 0x01ff) {
+               pr_warn("Invalid GPHY revision detected: 0x%04x\n", gphy_rev);
+               return;
+       }
+
        /* This is the good old scheme, just GPHY major, no minor nor patch */
        if ((gphy_rev & 0xf0) != 0)
                priv->gphy_rev = gphy_rev << 8;
@@ -3241,12 +3247,6 @@ static void bcmgenet_set_hw_params(struc
        else if ((gphy_rev & 0xff00) != 0)
                priv->gphy_rev = gphy_rev;
 
-       /* This is reserved so should require special treatment */
-       else if (gphy_rev == 0 || gphy_rev == 0x01ff) {
-               pr_warn("Invalid GPHY revision detected: 0x%04x\n", gphy_rev);
-               return;
-       }
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
        if (!(params->flags & GENET_HAS_40BITS))
                pr_warn("GENET does not support 40-bits PA\n");


Reply via email to