On 18.12.2017 22:43, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 21:56:33 +0100 > David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> I'll have a try tomorrow if I I''lose events with 20MB buffers per CPU >> when recording more than 60 seconds (on a very active system with >> mentioned scheduler rtaces being turned on). >> > > Another option is to add a '-w' option to record that causes the > recorders (what reads the data) to "wait" or force it to sleep even if > it did read something. I'm fine with that.
Also thought about that. Might make sense (and makes -s actually do what it advertises even when there are a lot of events coming in). Thanks Steve > > -- Steve > -- Thanks, David / dhildenb