At Sat, 12 May 2007 15:10:27 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 19:39 +0900, Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > > Fix Touchscreen driver for UCB1x00-based touchscreens to use > > sched_setscheduler() instead of setting the fields of task_struct directly. > > > > Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Index: linux-2.6.21-fix-ucb-drivers/drivers/mfd/ucb1x00-ts.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-2.6.21-fix-ucb-drivers.orig/drivers/mfd/ucb1x00-ts.c > > 2007-05-11 18:53:36.000000000 +0900 > > +++ linux-2.6.21-fix-ucb-drivers/drivers/mfd/ucb1x00-ts.c 2007-05-11 > > 19:33:20.000000000 +0900 > > @@ -214,8 +214,9 @@ static int ucb1x00_thread(void *_ts) > > * We could run as a real-time thread. However, thus far > > * this doesn't seem to be necessary. > > */ > > -// tsk->policy = SCHED_FIFO; > > -// tsk->rt_priority = 1; > > +// struct sched_param param = { .sched_priority = 1 }; > > +// > > +// sched_setscheduler(tsk, SCHED_FIFO, ¶m); > > Can we please remove the unused code completely instead of replacing it > by more commented out code ?
It's OK to me, but I'm not the driver writer and doesn't know how important are those comments. If removing them is better for driver writers too, here is the patch. Thanks, Satoru --- Remove unnecesary comments on driver for UCB1x00-based touchscreens. Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Index: linux-2.6.21-fix-ucb-drivers/drivers/mfd/ucb1x00-ts.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.21-fix-ucb-drivers.orig/drivers/mfd/ucb1x00-ts.c 2007-05-11 18:53:36.000000000 +0900 +++ linux-2.6.21-fix-ucb-drivers/drivers/mfd/ucb1x00-ts.c 2007-05-14 08:44:03.000000000 +0900 @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static inline int ucb1x00_ts_pen_down(st } /* - * This is a RT kernel thread that handles the ADC accesses + * This is a kernel thread that handles the ADC accesses * (mainly so we can use semaphores in the UCB1200 core code * to serialise accesses to the ADC). */ @@ -210,13 +210,6 @@ static int ucb1x00_thread(void *_ts) DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk); int valid; - /* - * We could run as a real-time thread. However, thus far - * this doesn't seem to be necessary. - */ -// tsk->policy = SCHED_FIFO; -// tsk->rt_priority = 1; - valid = 0; add_wait_queue(&ts->irq_wait, &wait); - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/