PG_lazyfree and PG_booked shares the same bit. Either it is a bug that shall fixed by the following patch, or the situation should be explicitly documented?
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- include/linux/page-flags.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- linux-2.6.21-mm2.orig/include/linux/page-flags.h +++ linux-2.6.21-mm2/include/linux/page-flags.h @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ #define PG_buddy 19 /* Page is free, on buddy lists */ #define PG_booked 20 /* Has blocks reserved on-disk */ -#define PG_lazyfree 20 /* MADV_FREE potential throwaway */ +#define PG_lazyfree 21 /* MADV_FREE potential throwaway */ /* PG_owner_priv_1 users should have descriptive aliases */ #define PG_checked PG_owner_priv_1 /* Used by some filesystems */ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
