On 12/20/2017 8:07 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Hi Manu,
>
> [snip]
>
>> @@ -998,29 +992,17 @@ static int qcom_qmp_phy_reset_init(struct device *dev)
>>  static int qcom_qmp_phy_clk_init(struct device *dev)
>>  {
>>         struct qcom_qmp *qmp = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> -       int ret, i;
>> +       int num = qmp->cfg->num_clks;
>> +       int i;
>>
>> -       qmp->clks = devm_kcalloc(dev, qmp->cfg->num_clks,
>> -                                sizeof(*qmp->clks), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +       qmp->clks = devm_kcalloc(dev, num, sizeof(*qmp->clks), GFP_KERNEL);
>>         if (!qmp->clks)
>>                 return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> -       for (i = 0; i < qmp->cfg->num_clks; i++) {
>> -               struct clk *_clk;
>> -               const char *name = qmp->cfg->clk_list[i];
>> -
>> -               _clk = devm_clk_get(dev, name);
>> -               if (IS_ERR(_clk)) {
>> -                       ret = PTR_ERR(_clk);
>> -                       if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> -                               dev_err(dev, "failed to get %s clk, %d\n",
>> -                                       name, ret);
>> -                       return ret;
>> -               }
>> -               qmp->clks[i] = _clk;
>> -       }
>> +       for (i = 0; i < num; i++)
>> +               qmp->clks->id = qmp->cfg->clk_list[i];
> I think i missed this one while rebasing.
> We need to use index with this. Should be:
> qmp->clks[i]->id = qmp->cfg->clk_list[i];
>

Thanks, I will change this accordingly in next version.


> Regards
> Vivek
>
>

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Reply via email to