Hi Viresh,

On 12/20/2017 8:56 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 19-12-17, 21:25, Sricharan R wrote:
>> +    cpu@0 {
>> +            compatible = "qcom,krait";
>> +            enable-method = "qcom,kpss-acc-v1";
>> +            device_type = "cpu";
>> +            reg = <0>;
>> +            qcom,acc = <&acc0>;
>> +            qcom,saw = <&saw0>;
>> +            clocks = <&kraitcc 0>;
>> +            clock-names = "cpu";
>> +            cpu-supply = <&smb208_s2a>;
>> +            operating-points-v2 = <&cpu_opp_table>;
>> +    };
>> +
>> +    qcom,pvs {
>> +            qcom,pvs-format-a;
>> +    };
> 
> Not sure what Rob is going to say on that :)
> 

 Yes. Would be good to know the best way.

>> +
>> +
>> +    cpu_opp_table: opp_table {
>> +            compatible = "operating-points-v2";
>> +
>> +            /*
>> +             * Missing opp-shared property means CPUs switch DVFS states
>> +             * independently.
>> +             */
>> +
>> +            opp-1400000000 {
>> +                    opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1400000000>;
>> +                    opp-microvolt-speed0-pvs0-v0 = <1250000>;
> 
> Why speed0 and v0 in all the names ?
> 

 Ya, all the three (speed, pvs and version) are read from efuse. So all the 
three
 can vary.

Regards,
 Sricharan

-- 
"QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of 
Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

Reply via email to