Hi Viresh, On 12/20/2017 8:56 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 19-12-17, 21:25, Sricharan R wrote: >> + cpu@0 { >> + compatible = "qcom,krait"; >> + enable-method = "qcom,kpss-acc-v1"; >> + device_type = "cpu"; >> + reg = <0>; >> + qcom,acc = <&acc0>; >> + qcom,saw = <&saw0>; >> + clocks = <&kraitcc 0>; >> + clock-names = "cpu"; >> + cpu-supply = <&smb208_s2a>; >> + operating-points-v2 = <&cpu_opp_table>; >> + }; >> + >> + qcom,pvs { >> + qcom,pvs-format-a; >> + }; > > Not sure what Rob is going to say on that :) >
Yes. Would be good to know the best way. >> + >> + >> + cpu_opp_table: opp_table { >> + compatible = "operating-points-v2"; >> + >> + /* >> + * Missing opp-shared property means CPUs switch DVFS states >> + * independently. >> + */ >> + >> + opp-1400000000 { >> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1400000000>; >> + opp-microvolt-speed0-pvs0-v0 = <1250000>; > > Why speed0 and v0 in all the names ? > Ya, all the three (speed, pvs and version) are read from efuse. So all the three can vary. Regards, Sricharan -- "QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation