On Wed, 2017-12-20 at 16:08 -0800, t...@kernel.org wrote: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 11:41:02PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote: > > On Tue, 2017-12-12 at 11:01 -0800, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > Currently, blk-mq timeout path synchronizes against the usual > > > issue/completion path using a complex scheme involving atomic > > > bitflags, REQ_ATOM_*, memory barriers and subtle memory coherence > > > rules. Unfortunatley, it contains quite a few holes. > > > > Hello Tejun, > > > > An attempt to run SCSI I/O with this patch series applied resulted in > > the following: > > Can you please try the v3? There were a couple bugs that I missed > while testing earlier versions. > > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171216120726.517153-1...@kernel.org
Will do. But please Cc: linux-block in case you would post a v4 of this patch series. I searched the linux-block folder of my mailbox for the latest version of this patch series and that is how I ended up testing v2 instead of v3 ... Bart.
